REBELDIA DE L@S IMOGRANT@S.

lunes, 24 de julio de 2023

Presidente de Ecuador declara estado de excepción tras asesinato de alcalde ....,Chile, Santiago: la marcha de los 119.....,The Long War on Black Studies. It would be a mistake to think of the current wave of attacks on “critical race theory” as a culture war. This is a political battle. June 25, 2023 Robin D. G. Kelley New York Review ...., Venezuela: Multitudinarias marchas en apoyo al Gobierno X HispanTV / La Haine. Respaldo del pueblo al Gobierno en las áreas social, política y económica....,Colombia :: 24/07/2023 Presidente Gustavo Petro consolida su apuesta estratégica por el cambio popular X Horacio Duque. Quiere impulsar la movilización de la sociedad nacional... El embrión de una lucha anticapitalista X Juan Gallardo y Mirta Pacheco. Entrevista con Ricardo Antunes :: "La lucha por la reducción de la jornada de trabajo y contra la división de ocupados y desocupados es el embrión de una lucha anticapitalista"...,,HONOR Y GLORIA AL PRESIDENTE MARTIR SALVADOR ALLENDE ASESINADO EL 11 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 1973 Y CELEBRACION DEL FESTIVAL POR EL 36 ANIVERSARIO DEL Movimiento de la Peña del Bronx.PEOPLE POWER. Apoya UN DIA SIN INMIGRANTES y Huelga Global el 2023 .POR UNA LEGALIZACION PARA TOD@S L@S INDOCUMENTAD@S...CHILE.ANIVERSARIOS -HISTORICOS. SABADO 16 DE SEPTIEMBRE,2023.MARIA SOLA COMMUNITY GARDEN.134 ST. AND LINCOLN AVE.SUR DEL BRONX.TREN 6.3ERA AVE-138 ST.2 A 7 PM.TELEFONO:1(718)2926137.. ANIVERSARIOS-HISTORICOS. 24 DE JULIO 2023 PEOPLE POWER. EN EL 36 ANIVERSARIO DEL Movimiento de la Peña del Bronx apoya UN DIA SIN INMIGRANTES y Huelga Global el 2023 .POR UNA LEGALIZACION PARA TOD@S...,

LA REBELDIA DE L@S INMIGRANT@S.NEW YORK-BRONX.

25 DE JULIO DE 2023.

https://www.archivochile.com

https://larebeldiadelinmigrante.blogspot.com/

Dorinda Moreno
HUMANRIGHTS@LISTSERV.MIAMIOH.EDU
Justice Initiative

The Long War on Black Studies.

It would be a mistake to think of the current wave of attacks on “critical race theory” as a culture war. This is a political battle.

Cliff Joseph: Blackboard, 1969

We fell under the leadership of those who would compromise with truth in the past in order to make peace in the present and guide policy in the future.

—W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Reconstruction in America

It is strange…that the friends of truth and the promoters of freedom have not risen up against the present propaganda in the schools and crushed it. This crusade is much more important than the anti-lynching movement, because there would be no lynching if it did not start in the schoolroom.

—Carter G. Woodson, The Mis-Education of the Negro

On January 20, Florida’s education commissioner, Manny Diaz Jr., tweeted out a chart justifying the state’s decision to ban schools from teaching a newly created advanced placement course in African American Studies. The graphic singled out the curriculum’s inclusion of Black queer studies, intersectionality, Black feminist literary thought, reparations, and the Movement for Black Lives as “obvious violations of Florida law.” It also identified scholars whose work was included in an earlier iteration of the curriculum as radical propagandists bent on smuggling “critical race theory” (CRT), Marxism, and deviant sexuality into high-school classrooms.

Despite the fact that the College Board had not yet released the final curriculum to the public, Diaz and the state’s governor, Ron DeSantis, claimed it violated Senate Bill 148, better known as the “Stop Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees Act,” or the Stop W.O.K.E. Act. Sponsored by Diaz and signed in April 2022, the law prohibits teaching anything that might cause “guilt, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress” or “indoctrinate or persuade students to a particular point of view inconsistent…with state academic standards.” In other words, introducing and teaching race, gender, sexuality, and anything remotely resembling critical race theory was strictly prohibited.

When the College Board released the final curriculum eleven days later, it had changed substantially. Most of the material the Florida Department of Education (FDOE) found offensive was removed or downgraded from mandatory to optional. The revised 226-page curriculum eliminated queer studies, critical race theory, mass incarceration, and a section titled “Black Struggle in the 21st Century,” made the Black Lives Matter movement and reparations optional research projects, and added a project topic on “Black conservatism.” The names of all the offending authors—including myself—were removed.

The College Board insisted that it had not bowed to political pressure, despite a trove of email exchanges with the FDOE discussing potentially prohibited content and a final letter from the FDOE thanking the board for removing topics the state had deemed “discriminatory and historically fictional.” The fact is that the College Board stood to lose millions of dollars if Florida canceled its AP courses. Although a federal judge blocked portions of the Stop W.O.K.E. Act that restricted academic freedom in public colleges and universities, the law still applies to private businesses and K–12 education.

Rather than accept a watered-down curriculum bereft of the theories, concepts, and interdisciplinary methods central to Black Studies, students, teachers, scholars, and social justice activists fought back. On May 3 they organized a nationwide day of action calling out the College Board and defending the integrity of Black Studies. Apparently it worked. A week before the national protest, the College Board announced plans to revise the curriculum yet again. As of this writing, however, no specific changes have been announced.

If you like this article, please sign up for Snapshot, Portside's daily summary.

(One summary e-mail a day, you can change anytime, and Portside is always free.

The right’s vehement opposition to Black Studies is predictable. Black Studies has been under attack since its formal inception on college campuses in the late 1960s, and repression of all knowledge advancing Black freedom goes back much further. Most state laws prohibiting enslaved Africans from learning to read and write were introduced after 1829, in response first to the publication of David Walker’s Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World—an unrelenting attack on slavery and US hypocrisy for maintaining it—and then to Nat Turner’s rebellion two years later. Back then the Appeal was contraband: anyone caught with it faced imprisonment or execution. Today it is a foundational text in Black Studies.

The historian Jarvis R. Givens found that during the Jim Crow era Black school teachers often “deployed fugitive tactics” and risked losing their jobs in order to teach Black history.

 In Mississippi, organizers with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) taught contraband history in “freedom schools,” while the Council of Federated Organizations (COFO) established “freedom libraries” throughout the state stocked with donated books—many on Black history by Black authors. Between 1964 and 1965, white terrorists burned down the freedom libraries in Vicksburg, Laurel, and Indianola.

Who’s afraid of Black Studies? White supremacists, fascists, the ruling class, and even some liberals. As well they should be. Not everything done in the name of Black Studies challenges the social order. Like any field, it has its own sharp divisions and disagreements. But unlike mainstream academic disciplines, Black Studies was born out of a struggle for freedom and a genuine quest to understand the world in order to change it, presenting political and moral philosophy with their most fundamental challenge. The objects of study have been Black life, the structures that produce premature death, the ideologies that render Black people less than human, the material consequences of those ideologies, and the foundational place of colonialism and slavery in the emergence of modernity. Black Studies grew out of, and interrogates, the long struggle to secure our future as a people and for humanity by remaking and reenvisioning the world through ideas, art, and social movements. It emerged as both an intellectual and political project, without national boundaries and borders. The late political theorist Cedric J. Robinson described it as “a critique of Western Civilization.”

A chief target of this critique has been the interpretation of history. Battles over the teaching of history are never purely intellectual contests between ignorance and enlightenment, or reducible to demands to insert marginalized people into the curriculum.

 Contrary to the common liberal complaint that schools “ignore” the history of slavery and racism, Black and Native people have long occupied a place in school history curricula. Generations of students learned that white people settled the wilderness, took rightful ownership of the land from bloodthirsty Indians who didn’t know what to do with it, and brought the gift of civilization and democracy to North America and the rest of the world. During most of the twentieth century, students were taught that Negroes were perfectly happy as slaves, until some conniving Republicans and carpetbaggers persuaded them otherwise. Leading history books by Ivy League professors repeated the myth, and in the first epic film in the US, D. W. Griffith depicted the “great and noble” Ku Klux Klan redeeming the South from rapacious, ignorant Negroes and shifty carpetbaggers, obliterating all vestiges of the Black struggle to bring genuine democracy to the South and the nation.

Black scholars and their allies consistently contested these narratives. In “The Propaganda of History,” the last chapter of his epic text Black Reconstruction in America (1935), W. E. B. Du Bois called out the ideological war on truth masquerading as objective scholarship. He believed in reason but came to see its futility in the face of white supremacy, colonial rule, and “one of the most stupendous efforts the world ever saw to discredit human beings, an effort involving universities, history, science, social life and religion.”

Du Bois wasn’t out to make a name for himself in the field of nineteenth-century US history. He was trying to understand the roots of fascism in Europe and in his native land. He saw the battle over the interpretation of history play out in the streets, statehouses, courts, and newspapers for decades—often with deadly consequences. The rise of the second Ku Klux Klan was inspired in part by a national campaign to erase the history of Reconstruction. The chief catalyst was Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation, released in 1915, the same year the renowned Black historian Carter G. Woodson founded the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History. 

Respectable white supremacists such as the Ladies Memorial Associations and the United Daughters of the Confederacy, founded in 1894, waged their own soft power campaign, building monuments to the defenders of slavery in the region and around the nation’s capital. The movement to erect statues celebrating Confederate war heroes took off in the early twentieth century rather than immediately after the end of Reconstruction because it took over three decades of white terrorism, political assassination, lynching, disfranchisement, and federal complicity to destroy the last vestiges of a biracial labor movement, ensuring that white supremacy and Jim Crow could reign supreme.

*

What the right demonizes as CRT bears no resemblance to actual critical race theory, a four-decades-old body of work that interrogates why antidiscrimination law not only fails to remedy structural racism but further entrenches racial inequality. Racism, these theorists argue, isn’t just a matter of individual bias or prejudice but a social and political construct embedded in our legal system. Taking a page straight from the anticommunist playbook, the right has reduced CRT to an incendiary dog whistle, turning an antiracist academic project into a racist plot to teach white children to hate themselves, their country, and their “race.”

The chief architect of this strategy is Christopher Rufo, currently a senior fellow at the archconservative Manhattan Institute, who in the wake of the mass protests sparked by the killing of George Floyd declared that the spread of critical race theory was behind the unrest. By his own admission, Rufo sought the “perfect villain” to mobilize opposition to the antiracist insurgency and had no qualms about distorting CRT to do it. Ignoring the scholarship while naming the scholars, notably Kimberlé Crenshaw and the late Derrick Bell, he presumed that these three words “strung together” would signify “hostile, academic, divisive, race-obsessed, poisonous, elitist, anti-American.” As he explained to his Twitter followers in 2021, the plan was to rebrand CRT and 

eventually turn it toxic, as we put all of the various cultural insanities under that brand category. The goal is to have the public read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think “critical race theory.” We have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans.

Rufo’s ploy soon became White House policy. He helped draft Trump’s now-rescinded Executive Order 13950, issued on September 22, 2020, which warned of a left-wing ideology threatening “to infect core institutions of our country” by promoting “race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating.” The document pitted this invented ideology against the principles of “color blindness” derived from a distorted reading of Martin Luther King, Jr. to justify eliminating workplace diversity and inclusion training in federal agencies. It helped spawn a wave of anti-CRT legislation. According to a recent study released by UCLA’s Critical Race Studies Program, from the start of 2021 to the end of 2022 federal, state, and local legislative and governing bodies introduced 563 anti-CRT measures, almost half of which have been enacted or adopted. At least 94 percent of the successful measures target K–12 education, affecting nearly half of all children in the country’s public schools.

These measures target not just CRT but liberal multiculturalism and, more pointedly, Black Studies, Ethnic Studies, Gender Studies, and any modern academic discipline that critically studies race and gender. (From here on I will refer to this scholarship collectively as “critical race and gender studies,” make specific references to Black Studies or CRT when appropriate, and use “we” occasionally when explaining what scholars in these fields do.) Most of these bills allegedly intended to protect education from politics share identical language because they derive from model legislation drafted by well-funded right-wing think tanks, including the America First Policy Institute, the Heritage Foundation, Citizens for Renewing America, Alliance for Free Citizens, and the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Stanley Kurtz, a leading critic of the African American AP course who masquerades as an investigative journalist for National Review, ironically named the model anti-CRT legislation he drafted for the Ethics and Public Policy Center “the Partisanship Out of Civics Act.”

Some of the text of that legislation was lifted from the section of Executive Order 13950 prohibiting the teaching of “divisive concepts.” These concepts include the idea that one race or sex is “inherently superior” to others; that the US “is fundamentally racist or sexist”; that a person, “by virtue of his or her race or sex, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive” or “bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex”; that “meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a particular race to oppress another race”; and that some people “should feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race or sex.” The assumption here is that confronting the history of American racism would provoke feelings of guilt and shame in white kids and their parents. Such legislation never considers the psychological distress Black, brown, and Indigenous students frequently endure as a result of whitewashed curricula, tracking, suspensions and expulsions on the slightest pretext, even abuses by law enforcement inside their own classrooms.

Such allegations against critical race and gender studies strain credulity. No serious scholar believes that someone is “inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously,” solely “by virtue of his or her race or sex.” We teach the opposite: that race is neither fixed nor biological but socially constructed. Modern categories of racial classification were Enlightenment-era European creations that relied on a false science to claim that discrete “racial” groups share inherent traits or characteristics. We reject such claims as essentialist and recognize that behaviors and ideas attributed to race, gender, class, and sexuality are not inherent but ideological, and therefore dynamic and subject to change. We use evidence-based research to show that policies that further racial, class, and gender inequality need not be intentional, and that anyone can be antiracist, regardless of their race.

The belief that hierarchies of race and gender are based on “inherent” characteristics is the basis for white supremacy and patriarchy. Such ideologies have been used to justify conquest, dispossession, slavery, segregation, the exclusion of women and Black people from the franchise, wage differentials based on race and gender, welfare and housing policies, marriage and family law, even the denial of women’s right to bodily autonomy. Many conservatives backing anti-CRT legislation do subscribe to the idea that certain differences, especially regarding gender, are “inherent”—that is, fixed and immutable. CRT and Black Studies do not.

Likewise, to accuse CRT of teaching that “meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic” are racist is to turn its interpretation of US history on its head. What Black Studies and critical race theory reveal is the extent to which wealth was accrued through the labor and land of others. The foundational wealth of the country, concentrated in the hands of a few, was built on stolen land (Indigenous dispossession), stolen labor (slavery), and the exploitation of the labor of immigrants, women, and children.

Finally, critical scholars of race and gender categorically reject the claim that any individual “bears responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex.” The language is intended as an attack on the idea of reparations, but advocates of reparations hardly claim that all present-day white people are “responsible” for slavery. Rather, they acknowledge that enslavement, land theft, wage theft, and housing discrimination resulted in extracting wealth from some and directly accruing generational wealth to others. Slavery and Jim Crow—more precisely, racial capitalism—suppressed wages for white workers, and the threat of interracial worker and farmer unity compelled the Southern oligarchs to pass antilabor laws and crush unions. The result was the subjugation of all working-class Southerners, including whites.

The right-wing movement to remake education is not limited to K–12. Nearly a fifth of the 563 anti-CRT measures introduced and 12 percent of those enacted target colleges and universities. In Florida, DeSantis has launched a successful coup against the administration of New College, replaced a majority of the board of trustees with handpicked allies, and begun to totally overhaul the curriculum, wiping out all vestiges of diversity, equity, and inclusion. The latest attack on Florida’s state university system, Senate Bill 266, which DeSantis signed into law last month, is a flagrant attack on academic freedom and faculty governance. The Board of Governors is charged with reviewing state colleges and universities for violating the Florida Educational Equity Act, which forbids teaching “theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, or privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States and were created to maintain social, political, or economic inequities.” The law also prohibits faculty or staff from advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion, promoting or participating in political or social activism, or granting preferential treatment “on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or religion.” And it gives boards of trustees the power to review the tenure status of any faculty member on demand, which means that even tenured professors are subject to arbitrary dismissal.

Buried in this law and shrouded by the state’s “anti-woke” rhetoric is another agenda: transforming the state college system into an engine of market fundamentalism beholden to business interests. One of its objectives is “to promote the state’s economic development” through new research, technology, patents, grants, and contracts that “generate state businesses of global importance,” and to create “a resource rich academic environment that attracts high-technology business and venture capital to the state.” In 2020 the governor and the state legislature established and lavishly funded the Adam Smith Center for Economic Freedom at Florida International University, tasked with promoting “a better understanding of the free enterprise system and its impact on individual freedom and human prosperity around the world, with a special emphasis on the United States and Latin America and the Caribbean.” SB 266 further elevated the Adam Smith Center by giving it all the powers of an academic department, including the ability to hire tenure-track faculty and offer majors and minors.

A matter of days before issuing Executive Order 13950, Trump announced the formation of the federally funded 1776 Commission to promote “patriotic education” and portray the US in a more positive light. Advisors for the commission blamed colleges and universities for distorting history and promoting “destructive scholarship” that sows “division, distrust, and hatred among citizens…. It is the intellectual force behind so much of the violence in our cities, suppression of free speech in our universities, and defamation of our treasured national statues and symbols.”

The commission issued its first and only report less than two weeks after the insurrection at the Capitol building on January 6, 2021. It denigrates popular democracy, whitewashes the history of slavery, says nothing about Indigenous peoples or dispossession, and claims that “progressivism” and “identity politics” are at odds with American values, not unlike communism and fascism.

Perhaps its most egregious fabrication is turning Martin Luther King Jr. into a colorblind libertarian. The report recasts the civil rights movement as a struggle for individual liberty and equal opportunity that, with the death of King, lost its way when it embraced “group rights,” “preferential treatment” for minorities, and “identity politics.” This is the same King who in his book Why We Can’t Wait (1964) supported “compensatory or preferential treatment for the Negro” because “it is obvious that if a man is entered at the starting line of a race three hundred years after another man, the first would have to perform some incredible feat in order to catch up”; the same King who called on the federal government to divest from the war in Vietnam, invest in the war on poverty, recognize racism as a source of inequality, and acknowledge “the debt that they owe a people who were kept in slavery 244 years.”

The stunning distortion of King’s ideas should surprise no one, King least of all. He knew something about the politics of history. On the occasion of Du Bois’s hundredth birthday in 1968, King delivered a speech at Carnegie Hall on the significance of Black Reconstruction’s challenge to the “conscious and deliberate manipulation of history.” Du Bois, King observed, proved that “far from being the tragic era” of misrule and corruption, Reconstruction

was the only period in which democracy existed in the South. This stunning fact was the reason the history books had to lie because to tell the truth would have acknowledged the Negroes’ capacity to govern and fitness to build a finer nation in a creative relationship with poor whites.

Multiracial democracy, or what Du Bois called “abolition democracy,” represented the greatest threat to the classes that ruled the South and the nation. It still does. DeSantis, Trump, Governors Greg Abbott and Kim Reynolds, the 1776 Commission, the Center for American Freedom, the American Enterprise Institute, the Ethics and Public Policy Center, and their copious allies all claim that their war on critical race and gender studies aims to present US history in a “positive light.” Why then not teach the history of movements that tried to make sure every person enjoyed freedom and safety and fought to end slavery, Jim Crow, patriarchy, and sex discrimination? If “patriotic education” embraces the principles of freedom and democracy, why not introduce students to courageous people—like Benjamin Fletcher, Claudia Jones, C.L.R. James, Ella Baker, Fannie Lou Hamer, Johnnie Tillmon, George Jackson, Fran Beal, Barbara Smith, and others—who risked their lives to ensure freedom, democracy, and economic security for others? Why not create a curriculum centered on the abolitionist movement; on Indigenous nations as early models for US constitutional democracy; on the formerly enslaved people who crushed the slaveholding republic, tried to democratize the South, and fought the terrorism of lynching, the Klan, and the Black Legion; on the suffragists and labor organizers who expanded our democratic horizons and improved working conditions?

But in our current neofascist universe, this is “woke” history. The right masks its distrust of multiracial democracy by calling it “progressivism” and its opposition to antiracism by labeling it “identity politics.” According to this logic, antiracism has sullied America’s noble tradition. Ruby Bridges Goes to School, books for young readers on Martin Luther King Jr. and the March on Washington, Ibram X. Kendi’s How to Be an Antiracist, and his children’s book, Antiracist Baby, have all been targeted for bans as subversive literature. There is no commensurate movement to ban books that promote racism, like Thomas Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia (1785), which asserts frequently that Black people are innately inferior to whites—physically, intellectually, and even imaginatively; Edmund Ruffin’s defense of slavery, The Political Economy of Slavery (1857); or books and articles by Samuel Cartwright, Josiah Nott, George Fitzhugh, Louis Agassiz, Herbert Spencer, Madison Grant, Lothrop Stoddard, or Daniel G. Brinton, the eminent anthropologist who in his book Races and Peoples (1890) wrote, “That philanthropy is false, that religion is rotten, which would sanction a white woman enduring the embrace of a colored man.”

The point of these attacks is to turn antiracists into enemies and the people identified as “white” into victims. Marginalized white working people, who are victims of stagnant wages, privatized health care, big pharma, and tax policies that redistribute wealth upward, are taught instead that they live in what was once the perfect country until woke forces took over and gave their hard-earned income to the Negroes and immigrants who are now trying to take their guns. It would be a mistake to think of such rhetoric as a “culture war.” This is a political battle. It is part and parcel of the right-wing war on democracy, reproductive rights, labor, the environment, land defenders and water protectors, the rights and safety of transgender and nonbinary people, asylum seekers, the undocumented, the unhoused, the poor, and the perpetual war on Black communities.

As I write these words, the predominantly white Republican Mississippi state legislature is stripping the predominantly Black city of Jackson of political authority and revenue. Many of the same states adopting anti-CRT laws are also passing anti-trans bills and extreme abortion bans, and relaxing gun laws. The Tennessee state legislature expelled two young Black representatives, Justin Jones and Justin Pearson, for joining protesters demanding stricter gun laws after a mass shooting at a Nashville elementary school. And Texas governor Greg Abbott is planning to pardon Daniel Perry, who was convicted of killing the antiracist activist Garrett Foster during a Black Lives Matter protest in 2020.

Colin Kaepernick, Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, and I put together a new anthology, Our History Has Always Been Contraband, to respond not only to these right-wing lies and attacks but also to an ill-informed mainstream discourse over the meaning, purpose, and scholarly value of Black Studies. Despite the claims of even well-meaning and sympathetic pundits, Black Studies courses are not designed to serve Black students alone but all students. The point is not to raise self-esteem or make students feel guilty, nor is Black Studies merely a diversity project. The essays and readings we gathered make clear that Black Studies sits not at the margins of social inquiry but at its very center. As we face a rising tide of fascism, we must remember how we got here: by protest, occupation, rebellion, and deep study. As long as racism, sexism, homophobia, patriarchy, class oppression, and colonial domination persist, our critical analyses will always be considered criminal


A version of this essay appears in Our History Has Always Been Contraband: In Defense of Black Studies, edited by Colin Kaepernick, Robin D. G. Kelley, and Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, available now from Haymarket Books as a free ebook and to be published in hardcover and paperback July 4. 

Robin D.G. Kelley is the Gary B. Nash Professor of US History at UCLA. His books include Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination and Thelonious Monk: The Life and Times of an American Original.

Subscribe and become part of our small but influential audience who rely on The New York Review to be an independent, indispensable, cool-headed source of analysis and information.

Investigan el hallazgo de cocaína en el interior de la Casa Blanca 
24 de julio de 2023.
https://www.resumenlatinoamericano.org/

Migrantes

Investigan el hallazgo de cocaína en el interior de la Casa Blanca

Chile impunidad II: Patricio Pardo y Jorge Salvo, dos víctimas de la represión policial que se han suicidado.

Chile impunidad II: Patricio Pardo y Jorge Salvo, dos víctimas de la represión policial que se han suicidado.

Marta Valdés, coordinadora de Víctimas de Trauma Ocular, por muerte de Jorge Salvo: “Es la impunidad la que termina con la vida de nuestros compañeros”. por Fernanda Araneda/DiarioUchile. De acuerdo a la organización de víctimas, la decisión del joven estuvo motivada por una "enorme carga de frustración ante el abandono del Estado”. En tanto, desde Amnistía Internacional, aseguraron que efectivamente …

Categorías: Derechos Humanos, Luchas sociales - Chile

Lea artículo completo

Chile a 50 años: memorias de lo que pudo ser X Tatiana Coll.

Alguien osado asomó la cabeza y gritó: la plaza está llena de tanques y nos disparan. Era un 29 de junio de 1973. El Tancazo había empezado....,

"MI NIETA DA SUS PRIMEROS PASOS".

Melinka.2023.Bronx,NY.

https://www.archivochile.com

Francia arde de nuevo por el asesinato de un adolescente tiroteado por la policía

“Para que el tiroteo fuera legal, el policía tendría que haber estado en peligro, que su vida estuviera en peligro, lo cual no fue así, ya que en el vídeo se ve claramente que los policías están a un lado y no frente del vehículo”, ha afirmado el abogado de la familia de la víctima. La ira popular se ha extendido a varias ciudades francesas.

Entrevistas Portada
Entrevista con el historiador Felipe Portales, autor entre otros títulos de Chile: una democracia tutelada, Los mitos de la democracia chilena e Historias desconocidas de Chile.   ¿Felipe Portales, a tu juicio, cuáles son los grandes rasgos del momento político actual… ¿Es un nuevo ciclo, un nuevo período; cómo prefieres nombrarlo…?   Tratando de ser […]

Estados Unidos. Detenidos en prisión de Guantánamo sufren tratos crueles

Resumen Latinoamericano, 27 de junio de 2023.

Los 30 hombres allí recluidos están sometidos a continuos tratos crueles, inhumanos y degradantes, según investigadora de ONU.

Los 30 hombres recluidos en el centro de detención estadounidense de la bahía de Guantánamo están sometidos “a continuos tratos crueles, inhumanos y degradantes, afirmó el primer investigador independiente de la ONU en visitar el lugar.

Según Politico, en el informe de 23 páginas al Consejo de Derechos Humanos de la ONU, la profesora de derecho irlandesa Fionnuala Ní Aoláin calificó los atentados de 2001 en Nueva York, Washington y Pensilvania, en los cuales murieron casi tres mil personas, como “crímenes contra la humanidad”.

Sin embargo, para ella el uso de la tortura por parte de Estados Unidos contra los presuntos autores y sus cómplices en los años posteriores a los atentados violó los derechos humanos y, en muchos casos, privó de justicia a las víctimas y los supervivientes, pues la información obtenida mediante el martirio no puede utilizarse en los juicios.

A su vez, el gobierno de Estados Unidos asumió como suyas las conclusiones de la investigadora especial y discrepó en aspectos significativos con muchas afirmaciones fácticas y jurídicas” del informe.

Aoláin expresó su preocupación por la detención continuada de 30 hombres, quienes enfrentan a una grave situación de inseguridad, sufrimiento y ansiedad. Citó ejemplos como la vigilancia casi constante, el alejamiento forzoso de sus celdas y el uso injusto de medios de coerción.

Conforme a la experta, muchos de los detenidos con quienes dialogó mostraron indicios de “profundos daños y angustia psicológicos, como ansiedad, impotencia, desesperanza, estrés y depresión, y dependencia”.

También expresó su desasosiego por la incapacidad del gobierno estadounidense para proporcionar programas de rehabilitación de la tortura a los detenidos.

La atención especializada y las instalaciones de Guantánamo no son adecuadas para atender los complejos y urgentes problemas de salud mental y física de los detenidos, desde discapacidades permanentes y lesiones cerebrales traumáticas hasta dolores crónicos y problemas gastrointestinales y urinarios, subrayó.

Francia. Gobierno francés valorará estado de emergencia por protestas

Resumen Latinoamericano, 30 de junio de 2023.

Primera ministra Elisabeth Borne señala que se examinarán “todas las posibilidades” en reunión de crisis que encabezará el presidente Macron.

El Gobierno de Francia valorará la instauración del estado de emergencia en medio de la ola de protestas desatadas en el país tras el asesinato de un adolescente de 17 años por un policía, confirmó este viernes la primera ministra francesa, Elisabeth Borne.

La premier señaló en rueda de prensa desde la comisaría de Evry-Courcouronnes, en el departamento de Essonne (norte), que se examinarán “todas las posibilidades con el Presidente de la República a las 13H00 horas en la reunión que va a organizar” para analizar la situación generada en el país a raíz del asesinato del menor y las posteriores movilizaciones contra la violencia policial.

De acuerdo con el Ministerio del Interior, en la tercera noche consecutiva de protestas se registraron 875 arrestos en todo el país, 492 ataques a edificios públicos y 2.000 vehículos incendiados.

Por su parte, el mandatario Emmanuel Macron abandonó la Cumbre del Consejo Europeo en Bruselas para regresar a la nación gala y asistir a la reunión de crisis con miembros de su Gobierno.

Alrededor de 40.000 policías fueron movilizados este jueves en todo el país luego de que la madre del joven asesinado convocara a una marcha pacífica en Nanterre, en las afueras de París, en la que participaron 6.000 manifestantes.

A su vez, la Oficina de la ONU para los Derechos Humanos reclamó al Ejecutivo francés abordar “los profundos problemas de racismo y discriminación” de las fuerzas policiales tras la muerte del adolescente Nahel, de origen norteafricano.

A inicios de la presente semana, fue divulgado un video en el que se mostraba a un policía en un control de tráfico reteniendo al adolescente a punta de pistola, a quien disparó a quemarropa en el momento que aceleró el automóvil.

Fuente: TeleSUR.

Abren en Chile exposición con motivo de los 50 años del golpe (+Foto)

abren-en-chile-exposicion-con-motivo-de-los-50-anos-del-golpe
Santiago de Chile, 12 jun (Prensa Latina) Una exposición del pintor chileno Carlos Tato Ayress está abierta hoy en la Corporación Cultural de la comuna capitalina de Recoleta, como parte de las actividades conmemorativas por los 50 años del golpe de Estado.

Atajo abierto es el título de la muestra donde el reconocido artista comparte, a través de sus obras, las experiencias como sobreviviente de los campos de concentración Londres 38, Tejas Verdes, Estadio Chile y otros, instalados por la dictadura de Augusto Pinochet (1973-1990).

Tato Ayress estudió pintura en la Escuela Experimental Artística de la municipalidad de La Reina y en 1974, cuando tenía 16 años, fue secuestrado, junto a su padre y su hermana Nieves, por agentes de la temida Dirección de Inteligencia Nacional (DINA).

En 1976, gracias a la presión internacional, logró salir de prisión y viajó a Cuba, donde continuó sus estudios en la Escuela Nacional de Arte y en el Instituto Superior, y durante una década fue director y encargado de cultura de la Casa Memorial Salvador Allende de La Habana.

abren-en-chile-exposicion-con-motivo-de-los-50-anos-del-golpe

La exposición estará abierta todo el mes y cuenta con el auspicio del Goethe Institute y varias agrupaciones de derechos humanos.

rgh/car

 

 

 

 

 

 

UN DIA SIN INMIGRANTES POR TODOS LOS EE.UU.

 

  Las fuerzas beligerantes están actualmente bien provistas de armas. El régimen egipcio de Sisi apoya a Burhan, y las milicias de Haftar en Libia apoyan a Hemidti....,

 © Proporcionado por Agencia EFE

Tegucigalpa, 24 may (EFE).- Más 2,4 millones de personas tienen problemas de empleo en Honduras, país que debe reducir la tasa de subempleo que afecta a 1,8 millones de hondureños, indicó este miércoles el Consejo Hondureño de la Empresa Privada (Cohep).

"El principal problema de Honduras sigue siendo el empleo" y, según datos actuales, "hay más de 2,4 millones de hondureños con problemas de empleo, esto representa el 62 % de la fuerza de trabajo", indicó el Cohep en un informe.

Del total de personas con problemas de empleo, 1.846.507 están subempleadas, 348.513 desocupadas, 256.363 desalentadas y 25.678 potencialmente activas, detalló.

"La población con problemas de empleo tiene importantes repercusiones, no sólo a nivel económico, sino también a nivel social por los dependientes asociados a una persona empleada, ya sean familiares u otros", subrayó la empresa privada.

El subempleo visible e invisible, que afecta a 1,8 millones de hondureños , es el "problema principal" del país centroamericano, con 9,7 millones de habitantes, añadió.

Estos datos evidencian, según el Cohep, la importancia de implementar políticas para mantener los actuales puestos de trabajo, como para generar nuevos empleos formales.

La falta de oportunidades en el país es "el principal motivo" para que miles de hondureños decidan emigrar, por lo que el Cohep considera "urgente" crear condiciones adecuadas y un clima de inversión favorable para el desarrollo de empresas y generación de trabajo.

Honduras tiene 6,8 millones de personas en edad de trabajar, de ellos 3,7 millones están ocupados y el 44 % de estos son no asalariados, precisó el Cohep.

"El alto nivel de informalidad obliga a muchos trabajadores a vivir en pobreza a pesar de tener un empleo", aseguró la empresa privada.

Los jóvenes siguen siendo "los más vulnerables" al incorporarse al mercado laboral porque carecen de educación o formación profesional, destacó.

"Los jóvenes al ser población vulnerable ya enfrentaban grandes retos antes de la pandemia de covid-19", a nivel educativo, de empleo y acceso a seguridad social, lo que "limita su progreso social", apostilló

Un total de 968.192 jóvenes ni trabajan ni estudian en Honduras debido a la "falta de oportunidades y la deserción escolar temprana", de acuerdo al informe.

"El país no está en condiciones de perder más empleos o precarizar los ya existentes con políticas públicas mal diseñadas", enfatizó el Cohep.

El mercado laboral "no se recuperará antes de 2024" debido a la crisis económica provocada por la invasión de Rusia a Ucrania, el alto coste de la energía, la inflación y otros factores que generan "incertidumbre", acotó la empresa privada de Honduras.

(c) Agencia EFE

Otros medios alternativos

Chile Patriarcal: Aumenta el reporte de violencia contra las mujeres....,

Chile Patriarcal: Aumenta el reporte de violencia contra las mujeres.

Preocupante: Cifra de mujeres que reportan haber sufrido violencia intrafamiliar creció un 11,4 por ciento en 10 años. por Opazo/El Ciudadano.  Trabajo del Instituto Milenio para la Investigación de Imperfecciones de Mercado y Políticas Públicas (MIPP) de la U. de Chile analizó la evolución de este fenómeno a lo largo de diez años.   La violencia intrafamiliar (VIF) es un …

Categorías: Feministas, género y sexualidad, Luchas sociales - Chile

Lea artículo completo

https://www.archivochile.com  

Movimiento de La Peña del Bronx.

 


Los explotadores, la delincuencia política burguesa nos habla de democracia y,

al mismo tiempo, levantan a cada paso millares de obstáculos para impedir

que los trabajadores participen en la vida política.

Leni

24 DE JULIO DE 2023

 PEOPLE POWER. 

https://larebeldiadelinmigrante.blogspot.com/

Network http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org

Jill Cowan and Kurtis LeeJuly 2, 2023The New York Times

The strike is part of a wave of recent labor actions in the nation’s second-largest metropolis, where high costs of living have made it difficult for many workers — from housekeepers to Hollywood writers — to stay afloat.
Unite Here Local 11 hotel workers hit the streets in protest after walking off the job., Unite Here 11

Thousands of hotel workers in Southern California walked off the job on Sunday demanding higher pay and better benefits, just as hordes of tourists descended on the region for the Fourth of July holiday.

“Workers have been pent up and frustrated and angry about what’s happened during the pandemic combined with the inability to pay their rent and stay in Los Angeles,” said Kurt Petersen, co-president of Unite Here Local 11, the union representing the workers. “So people feel liberated, it’s Fourth of July, freedom is reigning in Los Angeles and hotel workers are leading that fight.”

Representatives for the hotels have said that the union had not been bargaining in good faith, and that leaders were determined to disrupt operations.

“The hotels want to continue to provide strong wages, affordable quality family health care and a pension,” Keith Grossman, a spokesman for the coordinated bargaining group consisting of more than 40 Los Angeles and Orange County hotels, said in a statement.

The strike is part of a wave of recent labor actions in the nation’s second-largest metropolis, where high costs of living have made it difficult for many workers — from housekeepers to Hollywood writers — to stay afloat.

Why It Matters

Workers across Southern California in a range of industries have threatened to strike or walked off the job in recent months, displaying unusual levels of solidarity with other unions as they push for higher pay and better working conditions.

Dockworkers disrupted operations for weeks at the colossal ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach until they reached a tentative deal in June. And screenwriters have been picketing outside the gates of Hollywood studios for about two months.

Hugo Soto-Martinez, a Los Angeles City Council member who worked as an organizer for Unite Here Local 11, said that the breadth of industries locked in labor fights demonstrated frustration especially among younger workers, who have seen inequality widen and opportunities evaporate.

“It’s homelessness, it’s the cost of housing,” he said. “I think people are understanding those issues in a much more palpable way.”

The hotel workers’ strike comes just as the summer tourism season ramps up, and labor leaders say they are hoping to capitalize on that momentum.

Last year, tourism in the city reached its highest levels since the coronavirus pandemic, according to the Los Angeles Tourism and Convention Board. Roughly 46 million people visited, and there was $34.5 billion in total business sales in 2022, reaching 91 percent of the record set in 2019.

But for many workers like Diana Rios-Sanchez, who works as a housekeeping supervisor at the InterContinental Los Angeles Downtown, the pay has not helped to keep up with inflation.

She often wonders how long she and her three children, who live in a one-bedroom apartment in El Sereno, a neighborhood on the Eastside of Los Angeles, can afford to stay in the city.

“All we do in hotels is work and work and get by with very little,” Ms. Rios-Sanchez said. “We take care of the tourists, but no one takes care of us.”

Business groups say that simply demanding that employers pay workers more does not address the much-deeper problems that have led to sky-high costs of living in California.

Background

The union has been negotiating since April for a new contract. In June, members approved a strike.

The group has asked that hourly wages, now $20 and $25 for housekeepers, immediately increase by $5, followed by $3 bumps in each subsequent year of a three-year contract.

By contrast, Mr. Grossman said in the statement that the hotels had offered to increase pay for housekeepers currently making $25 an hour in Beverly Hills and downtown Los Angeles to more than $31 per hour by January 2027.

On Thursday, the Westin Bonaventure Hotel & Suites, a large hotel in downtown Los Angeles, announced that it had staved off a walkout of its workers with a contract deal.

Agreements made this year will set pay levels ahead of the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics, which are expected to be enormous tourist draws to the region.

What’s Next

Mr. Petersen said on Sunday that the strike would go on for “multiple days.” The Hotel Association of Los Angeles had said in a statement that the hotels would be able to continue serving visitors.

-- National Immigrant Solidarity Network http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org 
ActionLA Network http://www.ActionLA.org Peace NO War Network http://www..PeaceNOWar.net Activist Video Service http://www.ActivistVideo.orgChina-US Solidarity Network http://www.ChinaSolidarity.org 
China Delegation Project http://www.chinadelegation.org
e-mail: ActivistWeb@gmail.comTel:  (626)394-0710
To join the Action LA list, send e-mail to: actionla-subscribe@lists.riseup.netor visit: http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/actionla
Please Join PeaceNoWar Listserv, send e-mail to: peacenowar-subscribe@lists.riseup.net
Please consider making a donation to the important work of National Immigrant Solidarity Network, Action LA and Peace NO War

24 DE JULIO DE 2023.

 PEOPLE POWER.

https://www.lahaine.org

lahaine.org

Europa :: 24/07/2023.

Adam Smith: ¿Librecambista o filósofo moral? X Michael Roberts.

Es un mito creado por los librecambistas actuales que Smith se opusiera al gobierno y que subordinara el comportamiento moral al interés material
....,Cuba :: 24/07/2023.

Parlamento Europeo: ¿democracia y DDHH? X Gilberto López y Rivas.

El 12 de julio, el Parlamento Europeo aprobó una resolución en que lamenta el supuesto deterioro de la democracia y los DDHH en Cuba....,Mundo :: 24/07/2023.

El embrión de una lucha anticapitalista X Juan Gallardo y Mirta Pacheco.

Entrevista con Ricardo Antunes :: "La lucha por la reducción de la jornada de trabajo y contra la división de ocupados y desocupados es el embrión de una lucha anticapitalista"...,Europa :: 24/07/2023

La OTAN, un peligro latente para la estabilidad mundial X teleSUR / Misión Verdad

Se procura "que muera hasta el último ucraniano" con tal de cumplir con la agenda de destruir a Rusia :: Europa es una periferia subalterna....,Mundo :: 24/07/2023

La Policía reprime a manifestantes en una nueva jornada de la Tercera Toma de Lima X Actualidad RT / La Haine.

Las multitudinarias protestas de este sábado, continuación de la tercera Toma de Lima, contaron con la participación de decenas de movimientos sociales y gremios....,Venezuela :: 24/07/2023.

Venezuela: Multitudinarias marchas en apoyo al Gobierno X HispanTV / La Haine.

Respaldo del pueblo al Gobierno en las áreas social, política y económica....,Colombia :: 24/07/2023

Presidente Gustavo Petro consolida su apuesta estratégica por el cambio popular X Horacio Duque.

Quiere impulsar la movilización de la sociedad nacional...,Mundo :: 24/07/2023

[Fotos] Tercera Toma de Lima X Sebastián Flores.

El 19 de julio, llegaron de todas partes, y siguen llegando....,

El pasado 25 de junio falleció el peruano Hugo Blanco, uno de los dirigentes históricos y referencia obligada de los movimientos campesinos e indígenas de América latina

.....,::

REBELION.

24 DE JULI0DE 2023.

https://rebelion.org/


24 DE JULIO de 2023.

Chris Smalls, presidente del sindicato de Amazon.

Nacido el 4 de julio… marcado por el destino

HONOR Y GLORIA AL PRESIDENTE MARTIR SALVADOR ALLENDE ASESINADO EL 11 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 1973 Y CELEBRACION DEL FESTIVAL POR EL 36 ANIVERSARIO DEL Movimiento de la Peña del Bronx.PEOPLE POWER. Apoya UN DIA SIN INMIGRANTES y Huelga Global el 2023 .POR UNA LEGALIZACION PARA TOD@S L@S INDOCUMENTAD@S...CHILE.ANIVERSARIOS -HISTORICOS. SABADO 16 DE SEPTIEMBRE,2023.MARIA SOLA COMMUNITY GARDEN.134 ST. AND LINCOLN AVE.SUR DEL BRONX.TREN 6.3ERA AVE-138 ST.2 A 7 PM.TELEFONO:1(718)2926137..

ANIVERSARIOS-HISTORICOS.

24 DE JULIO 2023

 PEOPLE POWER.

EN EL 36 ANIVERSARIO DEL Movimiento de la Peña del Bronx apoya UN DIA SIN INMIGRANTES y Huelga Global  el 2023 .POR UNA LEGALIZACION PARA TOD@S...,

 
24 DE JULIO DE 2023
 

SOLIDARIDAD ENTRE REJAS

24 DE JULIO DE 2023

Workers World

24 DE JULIO DE 2023. 
CIPER-CHILE.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario